Research Article: Use of audience response systems (ARS) in physiotherapists’ training: a qualitative study
Abstract:
Objective To explore the experience of using audience response systems (ARS) in postgraduate physiotherapy training. Design Qualitative interview study following the ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ by Braun and Clarke. Setting Higher education university. Participants Ten Italian students (60% men, N=6; 40%?women, N=4) agreed to partake in the interviews. Results We generated four themes. Specifically, the ARS were perceived: (1) as a ‘Shared Compass’ (theme 1) between the student and the lecturers to monitor and modify the ongoing students’ learning journey; (2) useful to ‘Come Out of Your Shell’ (theme 2) as they help students to overcome shyness and build a team with peers; (3) as ‘A Square Peg in a Round Hole’ (theme 3) as they should not be used in situations that do not suit them; (4) as ‘Not Everyone’s Cup of Tea’ (theme 4) as mixed opinions among ARS’ utilities were found under some circumstances (eg, memorisation process and clinical reasoning). Conclusion Physiotherapy lecturers must use ARS critically, respecting when (eg, not at the end of the lesson) and how to propose them, keeping in mind that some skills (eg, practical ones) might not benefit from their use. Moreover, they need to consider that the ARS are not a tool for everyone, so ARS must be integrated into a multimodal teaching paradigm.
Introduction:
In the last few years, we have witnessed a shift in the strategies adopted in education: from traditional lectures to a more engaging teaching style characterised by the so-called ‘active learning’. 1 2 With the term ‘active learning’, we intend every moment where ‘the teacher/facilitator stops talking, and students make progress towards objective learning by actively doing something’. 3 Extensive literature demonstrated the benefits of active learning techniques on outcomes such as knowledge acquisition,…
Read more